Gary Lam, Hong Kong’s chief executive, has issued an advisory report to US government warning agencies on the possibility of forcing company and customer data into the illegal surveillance and special management zone (SAR).
From Consultant [PDF]It was released Friday by the US State Department, Treasury, Trade and Homeland Security, according to US time, “Rising risks related to data privacy” are one of four concerns for companies operating in the region.
The consultation provides the following honest assessment of the situation in Hong Kong:
The reason for this assessment is the Hong Kong National Security Act (NSL), which came into force on 16 July 2020 – the same day that this consultation was published.
In a press release announcing the consultation, US Secretary of State Anthony J. Blinken noted: “The policies of the People’s Republic of China and the government of Hong Kong undermine the important legal and disciplinary environment for individuals. And businesses must operate freely and legally in Hong Kong. ”
“Traders need to realize that the risks facing China’s mainland are now increasing in Hong Kong,” the report added.
The law advises that “the Chinese people and the authorities of the People’s Republic of Hong Kong raise the risk of using extensive legal powers to collect data from companies and individuals in Hong Kong for acts that violate ‘national security’.”
Although the agency does not find an excuse to advise national security to enforce the national security tax on unrelated matters, the document states that such abuse is possible. This possibility, as well as allowing Hong Kong’s chief executive’s National Security Act to allow wiretap or electronic surveillance without the need for a court order, has raised concerns that corporate data could be compromised in the United States.
The chief executive said “Hong Kong is an open and independent economy, supported by the rule of law and a strong regulatory body” and that the National Security Act is a controversial tool aimed solely at protecting national security and respecting human rights. Rights in Hong Kong.
The introduction of the same national security rhetoric was not seen as a major shift in the arrangements that brought Hong Kong back under Chinese control in 1997, and Beijing actually gained more control over the affairs of the Special Administrative Region than it had promised under the original law. Project “One Country, Two Organizations”.
The United States criticized the National Security Act when it was announced and passed, and continued to authorize authorities in Hong Kong on the grounds that it undermined democracy.
The new advice is important because Hong Kong is a major financial hub, which China sees as a way to deal with global players who do not want to operate under major land laws. Hong Kong needs its financial services to be strong enough to support its economy. For example, US criticism could shock Beijing by damaging Hong Kong’s prospects – even if it endangers Hong Kong residents.
The Hong Kong government seems to be realizing this potential Second Report In this regard, under the heading “US malicious attempts to damage Hong Kong’s reputation as a harmful global business hub”. ®