Lago’s role in Florida will be a big factor in Trump’s Supreme Court election

However, some in the political arena are concerned that Judge Lagova does not have a record of any abortion cases.

Leading anti-abortion activists say they support Judge Lagova’s appointment, but they support the judge Amy Connie Barrett 1973 Roy v. Due to the clear record of Wade, the decision to establish the constitutional right to abortion. They are concerned that the judiciary is unaware of a nominee who could influence the decades-long campaign to end the right to abortion, which now finally appears within their purview.

Although he is less well known in Washington than Judge Barrett, Judge Lagova has been a senior Florida attorney for many years.

A graduate of the Columbia Law School, he was a teacher of Colombian law review and worked at various Miami law firms, including Greenberg Drurick, before Judge Lagova joined the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida in 2003. Three years later, Republican Gov. Jeff Bush named the Third District Court of Appeals.

Paul C., a partner in the federal law firm and a member of the Federal Association, was sentenced to life in Judge Lagova Jones Day. Married Hugh Jr.. Mr. Hugh served as Charlie Christine’s public adviser to the former government and as Florida’s deputy attorney general. The couple has three daughters, including nieces and nephews. Judge Lagova’s mother – in – law Paul C. Hugh is a senior federal judge in the Southern District of Florida, appointed by President Bill Clinton.

Last year, on his second day, Republican Florida Gov. Ron Desantis elevated Judge Lagova to the state Supreme Court. He announced his recommendation at the Tower of Independence in Miami, a building submerged in the deportation code, where many Cubans first entered the United States. Speaking in Spanish, Judge Lagova thanked his parents, noting that his father’s unfulfilled dream in Cuba was to become a lawyer.

Eight months later, Mr. Trump nominated her for the 11th round, where she quickly faced the question of former offenders’ suffrage for a second time. Legal experts are divided over whether Judge Lahore’s failure to disqualify himself violated the code of conduct.