Last Updated 17:17
Almost all the answers ignored the center of the process
You could say about Rutte that keeping Hitler’s mustache in his painting was at least a crime. Theory Paddet does it for himself. His opinion that the Nuremberg tests were illegal clarifies what is the bubble and dust under his skull. Budet said the outrage has provoked public outrage. These processes were precisely the reaction to extremism, so you can read and hear everywhere that you deserve all the support. That way, for example CITI Manifests itself.
Almost all the responses to Pudet’s claim ignored the center of the process. After the surrender of Germany, the Allies created the Nuremberg Tribunal to try out the newly defined type of crime, i.e. crimes against humanity (or the human word as the English word Humanity In this regard, I believe it has been mistranslated). These are so big, so horrible, so elaborate that they have affected everyone in this world. Therefore, the perpetrators – including the accomplices – can only be brought before an international tribunal. The four major allies, the United States, the United Kingdom, France and the Soviet Union, already had it in 1943. Between themselves Agreed.
Eventually, fifty countries joined the coalition against the Axis powers. They were not part of the court, but sent spectators. The organization of a similar tribunal in Tokyo, which the Japanese leaders themselves had to account for, was vast. It consisted of judges from eleven countries, including ours. Officially, the special courts in Nuremberg and Tokyo were called the International Military Tribunal.
At the end of the last century, Nuremberg’s thread was reprinted. This time the United Nations had an important role to play. Both the Yugoslav tribunal and the International Criminal Court operate under the auspices of the International People’s Organization. It attempts to suspect suspects of four types of crimes: genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and aggression. The latter means waging or preparing for a war of aggression. In fact, these categories together are an extension of the term “crimes against humanity”.
Compared to Nuremberg and Tokyo, this is a big step. You can no longer say that the victors bring the losers to justice. Because it is affiliated with the United Nations, judgments are now administered on behalf of all mankind. So this context is not about dealing with terrorism, but about outlawing specific, horrific crimes that continue to this day after World War II.
Sometimes I think: the political sentiment in the Netherlands is sad.
And budded? He may have mentioned several international courts in his opinion, but it is correct Nuremberg It came to him. That is enough. It is clear that he wants to present the Netherlands in any form and unity. Let him cook in the soup he prepared himself.
For the rest, I think the issue of benefits should not disappear from the public eye. There is also no issue surrounding Kroningen’s natural gas. Especially now that Omtzigt has suddenly taken it easy.